Slerahan.com

Curated for the Inquisitive Mind

Real Estate

Did Baby Boomers Really Have It Easier?

Key takeaways

Millennials and Gen Z feel behind in the property market — and they’re not wrong.

Data confirms Baby Boomers dominate property ownership, holding 54% of all dwellings while comprising only 26% of households.

This is a structural wealth divide, not just a product of time.

Today’s younger buyers aren’t just grappling with higher prices — they’re juggling elevated lifestyle standards.

Each generation faces unique conditions. The key isn’t to complain, it’s to adapt:


Have you ever looked around the property market and felt like someone else already owns the whole board?

Like you’re playing Monopoly but your opponent passed “Go” decades before you were even dealt your first card?

That feeling is real.

And if you’re a Millennial or Gen Z, it’s probably more than just a hunch — data backs it.

In this episode of Demographics Decoded, Simon Kuestenmacher and I explored whether Baby Boomers really had it easier, how the game has changed, and what younger Australians can do to adapt, invest, and still build wealth in today’s environment.

For weekly insights and strategic advice, subscribe to the Demographics Decoded podcast, where we will continue to explore these trends and their implications in greater detail.

Subscribe now on your favourite Podcast player:

The numbers don’t lie: Baby Boomers hold the wealth

Let’s start with the data.

According to the HILDA survey — a longitudinal study tracking income, employment, housing and family dynamics — Baby Boomers currently own 54% of all dwellings in Australia, while making up just 26% of households.

That’s not just a disproportionate share, it’s a structural shift in wealth.

Boomer households, on average, are worth over $1 million, while Millennials sit just above $500,000.

That’s a 2x gap, and while part of that reflects the simple mechanics of compounding and time, Simon rightly pointed out that this gap is larger than expected and reveals a deeper imbalance.

And that’s before you account for debt.

Boomers have significantly reduced their liabilities, while younger generations are more leveraged than ever, carrying not just mortgage debt, but HECS debt, consumer credit, and higher living costs across the board.

It wasn’t “easy” back then — but it was different

Here’s the nuance that often gets lost in the debate.

As a Boomer myself, I can confidently say that we worked hard, lived frugally, and took risks.

Buying property in the 70s and 80s wasn’t stress-free.

Banks wouldn’t even consider a wife’s income when assessing loans.

Interest rates hit double digits.

The concept of dual-income borrowing didn’t exist until later.

But what we did have were structural tailwinds:

  • Free university education (no HECS debt).
  • Lower house price-to-income ratios — homes cost just 3–4x the average annual income, compared to over 9x today.
  • Rapid inflation and growth — property values doubled in the 70s and again in the 80s.
  • Wider suburban expansion — Boomers could buy affordable land on the city fringes with good infrastructure, and commute to the CBDs on free (and mostly uncongested) highways.

These factors made it easier to build wealth through property, provided you were disciplined and committed for the long haul.

Expectations have shifted — and that matters

Simon made a sharp observation: Millennials aren’t just facing a tougher financial environment, but they’re also managing higher expectations.

Baby Boomers started families in their early to mid-20s. Today, people are doing that a decade later.

That means:

  • The “starter home” needs to be more sophisticated — bigger, better located, and suitable for a family.
  • Remote work has made dedicated studies or home offices more common, raising the bar on what “livable” means.
  • Cultural norms now suggest each child deserves their own bedroom, adding another layer of cost.

This isn’t entitlement, it’s evolution.

It’s not realistic to tell people to “lower their standards” when those standards are now embedded in societal expectations.

And with urban density increasing, land is scarcer, construction is more expensive (thanks to higher standards, better materials, and labour shortages), and we haven’t built any new major cities to spread the load.

That puts even more pressure on prices.

Gen X: the forgotten generation — and the most squeezed

Often overlooked in these conversations is Generation X — the current “sandwich generation” aged 40–59.

These Australians are:

  • Still paying off mortgages,
  • Financially supporting their young adult children,
  • Caring for ageing parents,
  • Trying to upgrade to their final family home, and
  • Starting to think about retirement.

As Simon put it, “they’re being squeezed from both ends.”

The good news?

In about a decade, the financial pressure may ease as their children become independent and their parents pass on.

LEAVE A RESPONSE

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *